Landscape in Seattle: Cable Griffith talks to Peter Scherrer

Peter Scherrer
Peter Scherrer, Purple Woods, 2016, casein on paper, 11 x 15 inches.

Cable Griffith, a painter and professor at Cornish College of the Arts in Seattle, caught up with Peter Scherrer, a 2016 Two Coats of Paint resident artist, to check out Scherrer’s paintings at Salon Refu in Olympia. Both painters work with landscape imagery, and their conversation explored memory, the woods, and the importance of narrative in Scherrer’s new work.

Peter Scherrer
Peter Scherrer, Rubber Boa Clayton Beach, 2016, casein on paper, 11 x 15inches.

Cable Griffith: Maybe because we both work with landscape imagery and live in Washington, your work feels very familiar to me. There’s a sense that something is going on, as if a presence is embedded in the woods. But these paintings seem to be much more about depicting particular events or a narrative. And the titles seem specific to your own experiences.

Peter Scherrer: Yeah, there are certain works here that are from specific places and experiences. I’ve always gathered source material from road trips, hikes, and walking around my neighborhood, and subconsciously it finds its way into the paintings. Lately, I’ve tried to make it more intentional and personal, and to go deeper into my headspace and my surroundings. I think this exhibition, and my art making in general lately, has become much more personal. That’s what interests me. So, yeah, my paintings are full of specific narrative that speaks to my own experience.

CG: I feel like you are retelling a story or a favorite memory in each painting.

PS: Rubber Boa Clayton Beach is definitely based on one of my favorite stories. As a kid, I wanted to be a herpetologist. My favorite snake was the Rubber Boa, and I always looked for them–they live around here–but I never found one. And then, recently, I went to  Clayton Beach with a friend who had moved up from LA. I was telling him about my lifelong search for the Rubber Boa when I put my hand on a tree and one almost crawled down my arm! After 25 years I finally found what I was looking for.

Peter Scherrer,
Peter Scherrer, My Garden, 2016, casein on paper, 11 x 15 inches.

Purple Woods is about car camping with my girlfriend on the Olympic Peninsula and being in the woods at dusk. It’s that moment when you pull into a campsite and you think, “This is kind of weird…are we going to get murdered?” But the trip was really romantic and great. And we survived.

Theo and Me in the woods at the Bogachiel at Dusk is about a hike I went on with my son. It’s also about that time of day where you think you see things–it’s an interesting time of day to approach landscape painting. My Garden is a portrait of my garden with a fence around it. I love my garden, so I painted it.

Peter Scherrer
Peter Scherrer, Theo and Chewy, 2016, casein on paper, 11 x 15 inches.

CG: The one behind you, Theo and Chewy, is different from the others.  It’s more clearly an interior space and much more descriptive. I can almost identify everything in it.

PS: My house is getting torn down so I just want to paint it a bunch right now.  I think there’s a lot of presence in old houses and especially this one that I’m so familiar with–I’ve raised my kid in it. It’s a very complicated space for me, so I think it’s interesting subject matter. And I like how that painting turned out because it’s really busy, but there’s one moment of infinite depth, which is the door.

CG: In almost all this work, in terms of what is being described, the images seem to hover on the edge of recognition. Some things are clear–I recognize a car or a figure–but there are other areas that are left open for me to complete, or make my own decisions about what is what.  It seems like a very intentional decision to stop describing.

PS: I’ve always loved work that hovers on the edge of representation and abstraction. One of my favorite periods in painting history is the early to mid-20th century, when painters were all asking “Are we going to go abstract or not?” I enjoy having multiple entry points into the paintings, narrative, surface, symbolism, color, and so forth. Maybe my mind is all over the place, and I let that happen on the canvas. The process, especially with those small ones, builds, and then goes away, and then builds again, going in and out of focus until I like it. I love feeling my way around in the swamp of the painting until I find something I can grab onto.

Cable Griffith, W+H, 2016, fabric dye, oil, canvas,15 x 23 inches..
Cable Griffith
Cable Griffith, ASCII (CMYK), 2016, fabric dye and oil on canvas, 23 x 40 inches.

Peter Scherrer’s work is on view in a two-person show with paintings by Jean Nagai at Salon Refu Gallery, in Olympia, Washington, through May 30, 2017. In September, look for a solo  exhibition of Cable Griffith’s deconstructed landscapes at G. Gibson Gallery in Seattle.

Related posts:
Two Coats of Paint Resident Artist: Peter Scherrer
Infrastructure @ SEMINAR in DUMBO
Seattle studio visit: Cable Griffith

Two Coats of Paint is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. To use content beyond the scope of this license, permission is required.

Tags: ,

3 thoughts on “Landscape in Seattle: Cable Griffith talks to Peter Scherrer”

  1. Thanks for this fine, candid interview–offering a boffo final line no less–with a cool and thoughtful artist. In particular, the terrific “Purple Woods” strikes me as spooky, funny, and sexy in equal parts, establishing a distinctive pulp fiction/true detective warp as Scherrer suggests in his reflections on the piece.

  2. I love this work and the conversation about narrative. I’m going to be teaching a writing workshop this fall in a museum, using the work on the walls as writing prompts, and I found this interview very intriguing and inspiring. Thanks!

  3. I love this interview, and I love Peter, and I loved meeting Cable, but since this work was all done in the college town of Bellingham and shown in the college town of Olympia (secondarily, the state capitol),
    how come it was called Landscape in Seattle? Seattle is too big for its lovable britches imho.

    [Susan–you are right! Thanks for pointing out the inaccuracy of our Seattle-centric focus. –Editor, Sharon Butler]

Leave a Reply to Ruth Crocker Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *