I also recommend Daniel Wiener’s show, Making is Thinking at Lesley Heller, which features sculpture made with Apoxie-Sculpt. Yes, I agree: making IS thinking. The pieces, which are surprisingly painterly, look like gnarly, psychedelic-colored tree roots. Wiener is giving a gallery talk on Sunday, April 3, the last day of the exhibition.
Samuel T. Adams, “Unearth,” 2011, acrylic, oil, and carborundum on layered canvas, 60″ x 48.” This collaged and layered piece was included in “Incipient Image,” curated by Stephen Maine at Lesley Heller. Lately I, too, have been thinking about incompleteness, and since Maine manages to articulate my inchoate thoughts so eloquently, here’s an excerpt from his statement about the thought-provoking show:
An image occurs when the transient world of appearances, with its randomness and indeterminacy, aligns with the beholder’s fond hope that vigilant trolling of the visual realm will yield trophies of meaning. We expect paintings, drawings, and photographs to provide those images and meanings, however veiled or fleeting. But what of works that point to multiple readings—more closely resembling the unorganized, undifferentiated visual world? Such works function associatively, accruing significance as the viewer assigns it, eluding verbal definitions.
I think of the work of these artists as a portal to polymorphous visual experience rather than a vehicle of a fixed and particular significance. The viewer relies on hunches, hints, and evidence in dealing with these works, which possess not a single, embedded meaning that needs to be decoded, but multiple meanings as a condition of their existence. They dodge rather than declaim their significance, asking rather than telling how to make sense of them….
The works here are not formally or conceptually unresolved, rather they are resolved in such a way that they retain the speculative spirit of the earliest, inchoate stages of their making in a sort of suspended animation. It is not that these works necessarily look unfinished (though some of them might) but that the degree of finish allows for doubt about the relevance of an image to the array of issues each artist deals with….
In their work, these artists favor the discontinuous and open-ended, and leave it to the viewer to connect the dots. Their relation to imagery is bound up in a highly personal language with one initiate, one native speaker, who risks being the only audience. For these artists, the viewer’s bewilderment is a measure of their success, as they find deeper pleasure in the creeping twilight of ambiguity than in clarity’s shadowless high noon.